The Biggest Home Buying Deal-Breaker You Haven’t Considered

Kozzi-a-little-stone-house-294 X 441Search­ing for a new home can be daunt­ing task. Even in today’s mar­ket, which I’m told is tech­ni­cally still a buyer’s mar­ket, the good ones seem to get snapped up quickly. One thing, how­ever, that many peo­ple don’t con­sider, is the elec­tro­mag­netic envi­ron­ment in and around their prospec­tive house.

The sin­gle most glar­ing deal-breaker any home­buyer should beware of is some­thing that soci­ety has taught us to ignore. Many peo­ple, includ­ing real­tors I’ve worked with, don’t even see these health haz­ards and only look inside at the beauty within the walls of the house.

The bad news is, folks, that what’s in your back yard CAN harm your health.

The Mon­ster Lurk­ing in Your Yard

I’m talk­ing about high-voltage power lines. No doubt you’ve seen them, espe­cially in densely pop­u­lated met­ro­pol­i­tan areas. Here in the South, they’re every­where.  I’ve seen them run­ning through very nice neigh­bor­hoods with large lux­ury homes on golf courses as well as neatly fram­ing modest-priced sub­di­vi­sions that have cropped up in the ever-growing sub­urbs, spurred on by eco­nomic growth and more jobs.

The prob­lem is either lack of infor­ma­tion or delib­er­ate mis-information by the PR peo­ple who rep­re­sent power com­pa­nies and grant build­ing per­mits that abut util­ity ease­ments for these high-voltage trans­mis­sion lines. I think the stan­dard assump­tion is that only the area des­ig­nated as a right-of-way ease­ment for a power line is the area that might be cause for con­cern, but if the build­ing per­mits are granted, then it must be safe to build right next to an ease­ment, in the shadow of the pylons.

Power Lines Linked to Cancer

In 2002, the Inter­na­tional Agency for Research on Can­cer offi­cially clas­si­fied ELF Mag­netic Fields (the mag­netic fields emit­ted by high-voltage power lines at dis­tances of up to 1/2 mile away) as a Class 2B car­cino­gen, and a 25-year Swedish study of 500,000 peo­ple liv­ing near power lines con­cluded that the mag­netic fields increased the risk of can­cer four­fold in chil­dren and three­fold in adults.

A Typ­i­cal Client Call

I had a poten­tial client call me last month to ask if I would come look at a house they had under con­tract to buy. The wife was so happy about the house because it was in the same neigh­bor­hood, had a per­fect wooded back yard, and every­thing they wanted to accom­mo­date their grow­ing fam­ily. As a mat­ter of rou­tine, I asked her the address to pull up the aer­ial map of the prop­erty, and what I saw shocked me.

Read More…

Italian Supreme Court Links Heavy Cell Phone Use With Head Tumors

Executive CommunicationIn a recent land­mark rul­ing, the Ital­ian Supreme Court upheld a worker’s com­pen­sa­tion law­suit that argued a man’s head tumor was the result of heavy mobile phone use asso­ci­ated with his job. The court ruled that the Ital­ian National Insti­tute for Workmen’s Com­pen­sa­tion must com­pen­sate the plain­tiff, and accord­ing to the Inter­na­tional Com­mis­sion for Elec­tro­mag­netic Safety (ICEMS), views the con­nec­tion between cell phone use and malig­nant head tumors as “prob­a­ble”, for legal pur­poses. This court rul­ing is impor­tant because it sets a prece­dent for fur­ther legal action in Europe and across the world.

The ICEMS offi­cial posi­tion paper on the court case says that although the World Health Organization’s Inter­na­tional Agency for Research on Can­cer (IARC) ruled radio fre­quency elec­tro­mag­netic fields as a Class 2B car­cino­gen, “Pos­si­bly Car­cino­genic to Humans,” there is plenty of sci­en­tific evi­dence that war­rants an upgrade to Class 2A, “Prob­a­bly Car­cino­genic to Humans” based on the exten­sive back­ground research both in vitro and in vivo on the bio­chem­i­cal and bio­me­chan­i­cal effects of non-ionizing radio fre­quency radi­a­tion on liv­ing organisms.

Evi­dence of the Adverse Bio­log­i­cal Effects of Radio Fre­quency Radiation

Exam­ples of the sci­en­tif­i­cally observed effects of radiofre­quency (microwave) radi­a­tion include:

  1. Microwave-induced blood-brain bar­rier per­me­abil­ity, which has impor­tant impli­ca­tions in the onset and devel­op­ment of autism spec­trum disorders.
  2. Dimin­ished immune sys­tem func­tion in peo­ple exposed to microwave radiation.
  3. Microwave-induced sin­gle and dou­ble DNA strand breaks, which can be the pre­cur­sor to tumor development.
  4. Altered life-cycle changes in cells, result­ing in abnor­mal cell death and reproduction.
  5. Induc­tion of oxida­tive stress response in cells exposed to elec­tro­mag­netic fields.
  6. Neg­a­tive effects on preg­nancy and off­spring exposed to microwave radiation.

Read More…

PEMFs Healing Effect on Osteoporosis

photo of someone holding osteo test reportSince this is an infor­ma­tional web­site, and we don’t dis­pense med­ical advice or make med­ical claims about any­thing, I’m going to tell you a story about my mom. She is the sweet­est, most won­der­ful mom in the world. She, like many of her petite-framed Asian coun­ter­parts, suf­fers from a genetic pre­dis­po­si­tion toward devel­op­ing osteoporosis.

Over the past few years I’d noticed her height shrink­ing and her frame seem to become more frail-looking, even though she remains active, exer­cis­ing sev­eral times a week and lift­ing weights. Go Mom!

 

An inter­est­ing appli­ca­tion for PEMF: Osteoporosis

After I dis­cov­ered my PEMF well­ness mat, the iMRS, I heard from some of my iMRS col­leagues that they’d been hav­ing great results with revers­ing osteo­poro­sis with it.

I thought, wow, wouldn’t it be won­der­ful if there was an all-natural way to recover loss bone den­sity and help pre­vent against life-threatening hip frac­tures that so often plague the elderly?

So I decided to make my mother my guinea pig. I gave her a mat to use at home, once a day (twice a day when she overex­erts or injures her­self), and I let the bone den­sity scans tell the story.

When she started using the mat, my mother’s bone den­sity loss had just sur­passed the offi­cial diag­nos­tic thresh­old to be offi­cially cat­e­go­rized as hav­ing osteo­poro­sis. I was wor­ried about her, espe­cially since she had fallen a cou­ple of times in the past year or so, but thank­fully hadn’t frac­tured any­thing. She used the mat daily for about nine months and recently went in to have another scan done.

Med­ical doc­tor skep­ti­cal of PEMF

When she told her doc­tor nine months ago that she was try­ing a new type of well­ness mat for her osteo­poro­sis, he said there was absolutely no way it would have any effect on her bone den­sity. He pushed her to start pre­scrip­tion drugs, but she refused. Instead, she used the iMRS mat daily for the next nine months.

The results speak for themselves

When the results of her bone den­sity scan came back, her bone den­sity had returned to nor­mal lev­els. In only a span of nine months, she had recov­ered all her lost bone mass!

Read More…